<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Our Bedroom After the War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/</link>
	<description>A site about orbital matrices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:58:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis K. Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis K. Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>This album shows a lot of growth from &quot;Set Yourself On Fire&quot;.  Whereas Fire was very singular in style and theme, Bedroom explodes in unexpected ways. 
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This album shows a lot of growth from &#8220;Set Yourself On Fire&#8221;.  Whereas Fire was very singular in style and theme, Bedroom explodes in unexpected ways.<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Maiden</title>
		<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Maiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big Stars fan and have been listening to them for years - both Heart and Set Yourself On Fire have been longtime favorites.  I bought this cd a couple weeks ago before a long weekend in the mountains and was SO EXCITED by the first three tracks! I even called my sister to say how good the cd was! And then it was as if after Genova Heights they totally lost their energy.  

I&#039;m realizing that a really good producer has the ability to look at everything a band writes and says, &quot;this song is great, this one is crap. &quot; Sometimes a band has to write 30-50 songs to put together a 12 song album.  It seems like Stars wrote. . . well, 12 songs.  Just because a group writes a song doesn&#039;t mean that it&#039;s good enough to make it onto an album; the Stars are really awesome, and really talented -- the first half of the CD is evidence of that.  But whoever helped them produce the CD checked out for the second half, and the musicality of their song-writing is boring and flat; there&#039;s little for the ear to hold onto, and without strong lyrics to compel the listener (their lyrics are sometimes questionable to begin with), there isn&#039;t much substance left.  I&#039;m totally disappointed.  

I will be putting the decent four or five songs onto my ipod, but the whole CD won&#039;t go into rotation the way Heart and Set Yourself On Fire have.  It&#039;s a shame, too, because the Stars are so much better than this CD would lead one to believe.  Maybe they&#039;ll get their act together for the next one?
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big Stars fan and have been listening to them for years &#8211; both Heart and Set Yourself On Fire have been longtime favorites.  I bought this cd a couple weeks ago before a long weekend in the mountains and was SO EXCITED by the first three tracks! I even called my sister to say how good the cd was! And then it was as if after Genova Heights they totally lost their energy.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m realizing that a really good producer has the ability to look at everything a band writes and says, &#8220;this song is great, this one is crap. &#8221; Sometimes a band has to write 30-50 songs to put together a 12 song album.  It seems like Stars wrote. . . well, 12 songs.  Just because a group writes a song doesn&#8217;t mean that it&#8217;s good enough to make it onto an album; the Stars are really awesome, and really talented &#8212; the first half of the CD is evidence of that.  But whoever helped them produce the CD checked out for the second half, and the musicality of their song-writing is boring and flat; there&#8217;s little for the ear to hold onto, and without strong lyrics to compel the listener (their lyrics are sometimes questionable to begin with), there isn&#8217;t much substance left.  I&#8217;m totally disappointed.  </p>
<p>I will be putting the decent four or five songs onto my ipod, but the whole CD won&#8217;t go into rotation the way Heart and Set Yourself On Fire have.  It&#8217;s a shame, too, because the Stars are so much better than this CD would lead one to believe.  Maybe they&#8217;ll get their act together for the next one?<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carp</title>
		<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>carp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Definately not as catchy and addicting as Heart or Set Yourself on Fire.  A slight disappointment. 
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definately not as catchy and addicting as Heart or Set Yourself on Fire.  A slight disappointment.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Vo</title>
		<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Vo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-158</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a weak album, folks.  I was a fan of the previous albums and this new one just falls short.   Songs #2 (The Night Starts Here) and #6 (The Ghost of Genova Heights) sounds alike in both dullness and melody.   Song #2 is by far the worst song on the album and ruins it for me, because it sounds like the background song to a commercial for a cruise line.   The lyrics don&#039;t help, either. . . &quot;The night starts here, the night stars here. . . &quot;  I picture a loving older couple twirling on the cruise deck under the stars as the word &quot;Carnival&quot; appears at the bottom of my screen.   The album as a whole is very meh, with a few songs here and there that are simply all right.   They really do come off as a poor man&#039;s Arcade Fire or Morissey in this album instead of standing solidly on their own as they did in the previous albums.   I&#039;m really disappointed. 
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a weak album, folks.  I was a fan of the previous albums and this new one just falls short.   Songs #2 (The Night Starts Here) and #6 (The Ghost of Genova Heights) sounds alike in both dullness and melody.   Song #2 is by far the worst song on the album and ruins it for me, because it sounds like the background song to a commercial for a cruise line.   The lyrics don&#8217;t help, either. . . &#8220;The night starts here, the night stars here. . . &#8221;  I picture a loving older couple twirling on the cruise deck under the stars as the word &#8220;Carnival&#8221; appears at the bottom of my screen.   The album as a whole is very meh, with a few songs here and there that are simply all right.   They really do come off as a poor man&#8217;s Arcade Fire or Morissey in this album instead of standing solidly on their own as they did in the previous albums.   I&#8217;m really disappointed.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matrix-orbital.com/2009/11/23/in-our-bedroom-after-the-war/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I absolutely HATED &quot;Set Yourself On Fire&quot;, their previous cd (my critique of it is available to read elsewhere).  And I am so close to giving this new album 1 star, except that I must be honest and say that there are two good songs here.  I like &quot;The Night Starts Here&quot; and &quot;My Favorite Book&quot; - and THAT&#039;S IT.  The rest of the album has more of the same &quot;pweshuss&quot; treacly singing from both the man and woman.  I just hate how earnest, &quot;honest&quot;, and &quot;heartfelt&quot; they&#039;re trying to sound.  The reality is that it&#039;s false.  They&#039;re trying to capture something soulful, but it only rings hollow.  I feel like they&#039;re trying to deceive themselves and their audience.  I for one, am not fooled.  As for the dvd? Believe it or not, I actually had to see who was behind this trainwreck act.  The thing I noticed is the two leads appear to be much older than I imagined, like in their late 30&#039;s.  Is this a group dealing with arrested psychological development issues? The concert is boring and every song sounds the same.  My eyes rolled in embarrassment several times whenever the camera was on Bernard Sumner-wannabe, Torquil Campbell.  I have a serious question: were they (or are they still) formerly a Christian pop band? Because I recognize in Stars a blandness that typifies that genre.  That would explain a lot.  To summarize, I like a couple of songs on this album, and that is good - but this is a band I still have contempt for. 
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I absolutely HATED &#8220;Set Yourself On Fire&#8221;, their previous cd (my critique of it is available to read elsewhere).  And I am so close to giving this new album 1 star, except that I must be honest and say that there are two good songs here.  I like &#8220;The Night Starts Here&#8221; and &#8220;My Favorite Book&#8221; &#8211; and THAT&#8217;S IT.  The rest of the album has more of the same &#8220;pweshuss&#8221; treacly singing from both the man and woman.  I just hate how earnest, &#8220;honest&#8221;, and &#8220;heartfelt&#8221; they&#8217;re trying to sound.  The reality is that it&#8217;s false.  They&#8217;re trying to capture something soulful, but it only rings hollow.  I feel like they&#8217;re trying to deceive themselves and their audience.  I for one, am not fooled.  As for the dvd? Believe it or not, I actually had to see who was behind this trainwreck act.  The thing I noticed is the two leads appear to be much older than I imagined, like in their late 30&#8217;s.  Is this a group dealing with arrested psychological development issues? The concert is boring and every song sounds the same.  My eyes rolled in embarrassment several times whenever the camera was on Bernard Sumner-wannabe, Torquil Campbell.  I have a serious question: were they (or are they still) formerly a Christian pop band? Because I recognize in Stars a blandness that typifies that genre.  That would explain a lot.  To summarize, I like a couple of songs on this album, and that is good &#8211; but this is a band I still have contempt for.<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.927 seconds -->
